🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.