🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.